LHC Facts

Dear Sirs,

I would like to report numerous factual errors with the August 18, 2008 University of Wisconsin-Madision news article “Curiosities: What’s behind the claims that the new particle accelerator in Europe may create black holes that could destroy the Earth? Should we be worried?” at: http://www.news.wisc.edu/15490 False or misleading statements and assumptions include:

“if miniature black holes were created” … “would vanish almost immediately”

Buy Phentermine online
Buy Proscar online
Buy Biaxin online
Buy Lexapro online
Buy Soma online
Buy Xenical online
Buy Adipex online
Buy Zoloft online
Buy Propecia online
Buy Paxil online
Buy Wellbutrin online
Buy Diflucan online
Buy Valium online
Buy Prozac online
Buy Effexor online

CERN’s LHC Safety Assessment Group states “we are not working under teh assumption that BHs decay”. [4] Several recent peer reviewed papers concluded that Hawking Radiation “remains an open question” [10], “black holes do not radiate” [11] and “the effect does not exist” [12] Hawking Radiation theory as proposed in 1975 is fundamentally flawed, accretion of anti-matter by a black hole would add energy and mass to a black hole, not subtract. Alternate explanations requiring quantum tunneling are not compatible with predictions of ubiquitous existence of dark energy, and rapid micro black hole growth from Reverse Hawking Radiation is plausible [2].

“these hypothetical tiny objects would have too little energy to drag anything in.”

Micro black holes may grow exponentially from becoming charged by capturing charged particles in orbit outside the event horizon as theorized by Professor Dr. Otto E. Rossler [1] or from Reverse Hawking Radiation [2] as theorized by nuclear physicist and US Federal law suit co-plaintiff Walter L. Wagner. CERN’s 2008 Safety Report also considers the possibility that charged micro black holes might emit a charge originating from inside the event horizon. [3] CERN’s interpretation of charged black hole theory is notably refuted by Dr. Rossler’s work based on recent re-interpretation of relativity theory, particles inside the event horizon are infinitely far from the event horizon in space time. [1]

“high-energy cosmic rays bombard Earth and its atmosphere. “If there were black holes being made that are dangerous to the Earth, we wouldn’t be here.””

CERN’s LHC Safety Assessment Group acknowledged that any stable initially neutral micro BH (black holes) that might be created by cosmic ray impacts with Earth’s atmosphere would travel through Earth and into space. “While it is true that a BH produced by cosmic rays would not be stopped by the Earth…” [4]. Dr. Rossler refutes follow on arguments involving cosmic rays and Neutron stars “protected by quantum coherence effects of the superfluidity type: so miniblack holes can pass without friction” [5] that CERN’s Scientific Policy Committee (SPC) categorizes these arguments as “do require confirmation”. [13] Some percentage of micro black holes that might be created in head-on particle colliders will have velocities too slow to escape Earth’s gravity “less than 11 km/sec”. [5]

“None of the people who understand the physics of what’s going on have any concerns whatsoever and find all this rather amusing.”

Professor Dr. Otto E. Rossler is the most eminent and notable of the scientists who fully understands the physics of “what’s going on”. Dr. Rossler writes: “A nightmarish situation, that can still be hoped to be averted in time through communication within the scientific community, is drawn attention to. Only a few weeks remain to find out whether the danger is real or nothing but a mirage. After this time window is closed, it will take years until we know whether or not we are doomed.” [5][6]

Nuclear physicist and co-plaintiff Walter L. Wagner [in 2007 enlightened] CERN of the fundamental flaws in their cosmic ray safety arguments prompting a promise in writing from CERN for creation of the 2008 LHC Safety Report. [7]

“if miniature black holes were created — a scenario UW-Madison physicist Wesley Smith calls unlikely”

This statement may be supportable, but may also be misleading. The CERN Courier in 2004 predicted possible micro black hole creation at a rate of one per second.[15]. Michael E. Peskin writes in American Physical Society “Giddings and Thomas and Dimopoulos and Landsberg realized that” [Particle collisions at energies above the Planck scale must create black holes] “implies that high-energy collisions at TeV energies should produce black holes.”[14]

Dr. Otto E. Rossler, a modern day Leonardo Da Vinchi, Professor of Theoretical Biochemistry, visiting Professor of Theoretical Physics, inventor of the Rossler Attractor, founder of Endophysics, winner of the 2003 Chaos Award of the University of Liege and the 2003 Rene Descartes Award, contributor to hyper chaos, micro relativity and author of approximately 300 scientific papers.

Nuclear physicist and attorney Walter L. Wagner was notably attributed with discovery of what was believed in 1975 to be the first observation of a magnetic monopole at the University of Berkeley as noted by Time Magazine. [8][9]

 Sincerely,
 James Tankersley Jr.
 Founder of LHCFacts.org
 Middleton, WI

[1] Otto E. Rossler, Abraham-like return to constant c in general relativity: “Â-theorem“ demonstrated in Schwarzschild metric, http://www.wissensnavigator.com/documents/OTTOROESSLERMINIBLACKHOLE.pdf, (2008)
[2] MSNBC CosmicLog, The benefits of Black Holes, http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/07/02/1180976.aspx comment by Walter L. Wagner, (July 3, 2008, 12:49am)
[3] Giddings, Mangano, Astrophysical implications of hypothetical stable TeV-scale black holes, http://lsag.web.cern.ch/lsag/CERN-PH-TH_2008-025.pdf, (2008)
[4] LHCSafetyAssessment.Group@cern.ch, email, LHC Safety Procedures, http://www.lhcconcerns.com/LHCConcerns/Forums/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=10 (16 Mar 2008, 12:06:05 +0100)
[5] Otto E. Rossler, A Rational and Moral and Spiritual Dilemma, http://www.wissensnavigator.com/documents/spiritualottoeroessler.pdf (2008)
[6] SCIENTIFICBLOGGING, Alan Gillis, Professor Rossler takes on the LHC, http://www.scientificblogging.com/big_science_gambles/professor_rossler_takes_on_the_lhc, (12 August 2008)
[7] Walter L. Wagner, US Federal Legal Filings and Affidavits, http://www.lhcdefense.org/lhc_legal.php, (2008)
[8] Time Magazine, Bring is Back Alive, http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,913445,00.html, (1975)
[9] Walter L. Wagner, Wikipedia Cosmic Rays, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_rays#Unusual_Cosmic_Rays, (1975)
[10] Unruh, Schutzhold, On the Universiality of the Hawking Effect, http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0408/0408009v2.pdf (2004)
[11] Adam D. Helfer, Do black holes radiate?, http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0008016, (2000)
[12] V.A. Belinski, On the existence of quantum evaporation of a black hole, http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/03759601/1995/00000209/00000001/art00785 (1995)
[13] CERN Scientific Policy Committee (SPC), SPC REPORT ON LSAG DOCUMENTS, http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=20&resId=0&materialId=0&confId=35065 (2008)
[14] Michael E. Peskin, American Physical Society, The end of the world at the Large Hadron Collider?, http://physics.aps.org/articles/v1/14 (2008)
[15] CERN Courier, The case for mini black holes, http://cerncourier.com/cws/article/cern/29199 (Nov 12, 2004)