Archive for the ‘Character Assasination’ Category

Dr. Rössler Responds to El Naschie Watch

Saturday, July 17th, 2010
Hello fans of Dr. Rössler and people who oppose “character assassination” and censorship.

Below is a web site dedicated to attacking the credibility and characters of Dr. Otto Rössler (http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/User:Rossler) and Dr. El Naschie (http://www.el-naschie.net/) who published many of Dr. Rossler’s papers in the past (as editor of Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, fired shortly after Dr. Rössler publicly raised concerns about possible theoretical safety issues with the Large Hadron Collider).  This web site began publishing (full time) in February 2009, and it is very professional appearing.

The disturbing web site is El Naschie Watch:
http://elnaschiewatch.blogspot.com/2010/07/master-list-for-otto-e-rossler.html

The web site appears to be a “full time effort” by a writer with strong
physics background and a single agenda:  To attack and discredit the
reputations of Dr. Rössler and Dr. Naschie.

This appears similar to the full time effort of physicists who blogged in
pairs at “LHC Concerns.com” in 2008 in an effort to calm and refute concerns
about CERN and the Large Hadron Collider,   This effort began shortly after
CERN announce it would direct 10 of its employees (
http://www.lhcfacts.org/category/cern/lhc-bloggers/) to blog on the web in
pairs, to help educate the public about CERN and the LHC.

El Naschie Watch is currently focused on removing Dr. Rössler from the many
editorial boards that he is a member of (
http://elnaschiewatch.blogspot.com/2010/07/master-list-for-otto-e-rossler.html
).

I find it a bit disturbing that this effort might be funded by CERN
(unknown), as CERN may be immune from most legal recourse due to its
“special legal status” as an independent scientific organization.

[LHC Facts Administrator]

—————————————————-

Dear Jim:

“I had not seen this highly professional website and its great anonymously signed efforts at “proving” that I do not even “deserve” to be proven wrong with my proof of danger.

This gives everyone the impression that the whole scientific community is unable to disprove my simple new result in general relativity found as an implication of Einstein’s equation and Birkhoff’s theorem - notwithstanding the fact that it upsets the safety equation of the currently running LHC experiment at CERN by an infinite factor.

In this way, this marvellous website does a maximally large disservice to CERN.

If this is the best the scientific community can muster in the face of new results that if correct save the planet, the planet gets a maximally clear message here - on one of the most beautifully done web pages of history.

Being CERN’s only genuine friend, I feel I have to ask for an apology in their name. If I do get it, this will be the strongest evidence so far that CERN’s alleged allies do have a counterproof up their sleeve. Since all I desire is to be proven wrong, this at first sight “too fair” response of mine makes maximum sense to everyone. For ’science is friendship’as you know.”

Take care, dear Jim,
Otto.
P.S. Could you post this?