Check this link to some of the as yet unsolved problems in physics:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsolved_problems_in_physics

Basically scientists have given up and have decided to import maybe only the second most destructive thing in the universe. A rip or a white hole has not even been discussed because it is considered to be well within the safe Planck energy limit. There is no way of knowing if this will be the equivalent of feeding the world through a shredding machine via a black hole or incineration by a opening a white hole when the Lhc burns a hole in reality.

In the formation of a stellar black hole at least two thirds of the mass of a star explodes outwards. This machine is not a genuine attempt to imitate nature … it is an out and out lie which is why I have such low expectations of the sciences blah, blah, blah.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmologist

there’s no way that L. Sancho fits the definition. BTW JTankers, the person whose face appears in your webpage below the title “Luis Sancho, Co-Plaintiff” is NOT Luis Sancho. If you had watched the movie that you post, you would know that the guy is actually some LHCb experimentalist, who I suspect would not be too pleased with the association… Cheers Ptrslv72

Within that tiny subset of what is real via equations are things called paradox and anomaly. As good as any known theory is it still falls far short of being able to describe what is real and why things work. That is just cosmology.

There is every other branch of science to some degree more or less unable to give a simple answer to … what is real?

Ptrslv72

I see that LHCfacts still gives a lot of prominence to the rants of Luis Sancho. You may be interested in checking his own website:

http://www.unificationtheory.com/

honestly, JTankers, what do you think about it? Would you explain why anybody should take the word of this nutter against that of the entire particle physics community? I dare you to put your money where your
mouth is, and link Sancho’s webpage from LHCfacts.

While we are at it, you might also want to check this blog where somebody bothered to investigate Wagner’s credentials (and past and pending lawsuits):

http://shouldersofgiantmidgets.blogspot.com/2008/10/return-of-radiation-man.html

Cheers,

Ptrslv72

Did you finally see how silly your site is?

Inceidently, wagner, sancho, blodgett and all the rest seem to have gone into hiding too.

Helium in the cooling system is too low density to detonate as nuclear explosives. (3 HE4 — C12). But if it will result in the cavity of the accelerator and thrust with a accelerated protons, it would certainly receive the necessary temperature. But it will get needed pressure - because the ring accelerator - this is actually tokomak( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak) , that is the same as ITER - and it helium plasma can be kept by magnetic field that there is also and designed for retention. It is unlikely that such an explosion would be particularly strong, but the accelerator can be destroyed.

It is just idea of layman, not a strong physics.

***
Alexei Turchin
Se my book STRUCTURE OF THE GLOBAL CATASTROPHE Risks of human extinction in the XXI century http://www.scribd.com/doc/6250354/STRUCTURE-OF-THE-GLOBAL-CATASTROPHE-Risks-of-human-extinction-in-the-XXI-century-

High energy collisions have kljkljkl not begun. Even after high energy collission begin the world will still be here. The question is will the world be the same and for how long?