<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: James Blodgett on&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lhcfacts.org/2008/06/11/james-blodgett-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lhcfacts.org/2008/06/11/james-blodgett-on/</link>
	<description>Large Hadron Collider Safety Facts</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Noonan</title>
		<link>http://www.lhcfacts.org/2008/06/11/james-blodgett-on/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Noonan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lhcfacts.org/?p=53#comment-100</guid>
		<description>There is no argument that scientists, physicists and cosmologists are all very clever people and that much of what is known is based on some very good theoretical and tested ideas. There is a small problem in that there is no actual guarantee that the universe began from a single instantaneous point.

While that may sound a bit trivial it must be remembered that some universe models predict a rebound theory. That means incomplete collapsing to a bounce position and universe does not reach a single point at any stage. Rebound Theory may indicate the energy being tested was not ever in existence at a single point.

The indication that something has gone horribly wrong with science is that the Higgs particle fails to show up in the smaller predicted 160 to 200 GeV energy range. Put simply it may mean single point energy was never there to begin with. Since hitting the one TeV scale in 2001 the science has presented symmetry breaking and experiments 'breaking' the known laws of physics as achievements.

One can only stay safely within defined error margins if the experimenters really know what the safe error margin is. It is worth considering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no argument that scientists, physicists and cosmologists are all very clever people and that much of what is known is based on some very good theoretical and tested ideas. There is a small problem in that there is no actual guarantee that the universe began from a single instantaneous point.</p>
<p>While that may sound a bit trivial it must be remembered that some universe models predict a rebound theory. That means incomplete collapsing to a bounce position and universe does not reach a single point at any stage. Rebound Theory may indicate the energy being tested was not ever in existence at a single point.</p>
<p>The indication that something has gone horribly wrong with science is that the Higgs particle fails to show up in the smaller predicted 160 to 200 GeV energy range. Put simply it may mean single point energy was never there to begin with. Since hitting the one TeV scale in 2001 the science has presented symmetry breaking and experiments &#8216;breaking&#8217; the known laws of physics as achievements.</p>
<p>One can only stay safely within defined error margins if the experimenters really know what the safe error margin is. It is worth considering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
