Comments on: James Blodgett’s Deductive Logic http://www.lhcfacts.org/2008/06/04/deductive-vs-inductive-logic/ Large Hadron Collider Safety Facts Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:53:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: sandycharm http://www.lhcfacts.org/2008/06/04/deductive-vs-inductive-logic/#comment-983 sandycharm Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:08:28 +0000 http://www.lhcfacts.org/?p=36#comment-983 Huh? I am a physics student and I don't get your worry. Induction has always been a vital part in the process of acquiring knowledge. With deduction alone, you'd be going in circles. I'd say the probabilities of LHC creating something to devour the earth is effectively zero. Because, the LHC is unlike to produce anything that cosmic collisions (many has much higher energy) has not produce before. In terms of order of magnitude concerned, you might see a human going through a wall first. (without destroying the wall). Huh? I am a physics student and I don’t get your worry. Induction has always been a vital part in the process of acquiring knowledge. With deduction alone, you’d be going in circles.

I’d say the probabilities of LHC creating something to devour the earth is effectively zero. Because, the LHC is unlike to produce anything that cosmic collisions (many has much higher energy) has not produce before. In terms of order of magnitude concerned, you might see a human going through a wall first. (without destroying the wall).

]]>