Comments on: Questions and Observations http://www.lhcfacts.org/2008/05/25/questions-and-observations/ Large Hadron Collider Safety Facts Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:53:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Michael Noonan http://www.lhcfacts.org/2008/05/25/questions-and-observations/#comment-28 Michael Noonan Thu, 29 May 2008 22:10:25 +0000 http://www.lhcfacts.org/?p=20#comment-28 The chance of a damaging micro black hole collision is calculated on an event being able to interact with a neutron star. Why not look at an event arena much closer to the earth, the sun. The sun converts around 35 to 40 tonnes of hydrogen to helium every second to produce light and heat. Now the action of protons forming a join in a four way collision is less likely than a pair merger. The action of fusion is one currently described as the pressure at the center of the sun is responsible for fusion. Well that is partly right. As temperature and pressure rise the chance of fusion happening increases but it is the increased Brownian motion of the particles which leads to more collisions. These collisions are much less energetic than what is being proposed at CERN. In the world of quantum mechanics the particles do not touch under pressure until they are in a neutron star. So all the fusion events in the sun are by collision and not pressure. 35 to 40 tonnes a second of four way interactions causing hydrogen to fuse to helium. Protons do merge otherwise there would be no elements. Protons merge due to impact collisions brought on by a high state of Brownian motion. To fuse under pressure means at some point the the sun would need to have a neutron star core. To say merge due to pressure is an admission that even the basics of nuclear physics are being misrepresented in order to get the particle accelerator approved. This experiment at CERN is not right in fact it is not even wrong using the reasons given. CERN is an entirely new and unknown and unpredictable science with unknown consequences. The chance of a damaging micro black hole collision is calculated on an event being able to interact with a neutron star. Why not look at an event arena much closer to the earth, the sun. The sun converts around 35 to 40 tonnes of hydrogen to helium every second to produce light and heat.

Now the action of protons forming a join in a four way collision is less likely than a pair merger. The action of fusion is one currently described as the pressure at the center of the sun is responsible for fusion.

Well that is partly right. As temperature and pressure rise the chance of fusion happening increases but it is the increased Brownian motion of the particles which leads to more collisions. These collisions are much less energetic than what is being proposed at CERN.

In the world of quantum mechanics the particles do not touch under pressure until they are in a neutron star. So all the fusion events in the sun are by collision and not pressure. 35 to 40 tonnes a second of four way interactions causing hydrogen to fuse to helium.

Protons do merge otherwise there would be no elements. Protons merge due to impact collisions brought on by a high state of Brownian motion. To fuse under pressure means at some point the the sun would need to have a neutron star core. To say merge due to pressure is an admission that even the basics of nuclear physics are being misrepresented in order to get the particle accelerator approved.

This experiment at CERN is not right in fact it is not even wrong using the reasons given. CERN is an entirely new and unknown and unpredictable science with unknown consequences.

]]>